1 回答

TA貢獻(xiàn)1859條經(jīng)驗(yàn) 獲得超6個(gè)贊
我通常同意Bergi的評(píng)論。無(wú)點(diǎn)不應(yīng)該是一個(gè)目標(biāo)。當(dāng)我開(kāi)始編寫(xiě) Ramda 時(shí),我就迷上了它,其中有許多功能旨在幫助使事情變得無(wú)意義。我很少再推薦他們了。我不認(rèn)為useWith
或者converge
經(jīng)常使函數(shù)更易于閱讀或維護(hù)。
但是有一個(gè)函數(shù),lift
,在 FP 世界中廣為人知,在這里很有幫助。我認(rèn)為是lift
將功能從價(jià)值領(lǐng)域提升到這些價(jià)值的容器領(lǐng)域。因此lift (add) (Maybe(3), Maybe(5)) //=> Maybe(8)
。當(dāng)與產(chǎn)生我們的值的函數(shù)一起使用時(shí),它可能會(huì)像這樣工作:
lift ((a, b) => a + b) (
n => n * 2,
n => n - 1
) (5)
//=> (5 * 2) + (5 -1) //=> 14`.
這正是您想要對(duì)您的功能做的事情。所以這是一個(gè)lift基于 - 的無(wú)點(diǎn)版本:
const hfffqs2 = either (
lift (has) (getFilterQueryString, getPages),
lift (has) (getFilterQueryString, getNewlyLoadedUsers)
)
我發(fā)現(xiàn)這比您上面的任何一個(gè)版本都更具可讀性。
我認(rèn)為該版本可與我能想到的最簡(jiǎn)單的非 Ramda 版本相媲美:
const hfffqs3 = state => {
const query = getFilterQueryString(state);
return query in getPages(state)
|| query in getNewlyLoadedUsers(state)
}
不過(guò),它不一定更具可讀性。而且它的效率較低——除了額外的函數(shù)調(diào)用——它必須調(diào)用getFilterQueryString兩次。但它是一個(gè)可讀和可維護(hù)的功能。
如果lift還不是很清楚,中間格式可能如下所示:
const hfffqs1 = either (
state => has(getFilterQueryString(state), getPages(state)),
state => has(getFilterQueryString(state), getNewlyLoadedUsers(state))
)
通過(guò)應(yīng)用getFilterQueryStringand getState,lift (has)我們得到state => has(getFilterQueryString(state), getPages(state)), 和下一行的等價(jià)物。我們已經(jīng)將函數(shù)從字符串和對(duì)象領(lǐng)域提升到返回字符串和對(duì)象的函數(shù)領(lǐng)域。我們可以傳遞給這兩個(gè)函數(shù)來(lái)獲取一個(gè)字符串和一個(gè)對(duì)象。hasstate
您可以在以下代碼段中看到這些操作:
// Dummy implementations just for demo. `state` is a small integer.
const getFilterQueryString = (state) => ['foo', 'bar', 'baz', 'qux', 'corge', 'grault'][state]
const getPages = (state) => [{foo: 1, bar: 2}, {foo: 1, corge: 2, grault: 3}, {baz: 1}, {foo: 1, grault: 2}, {corge: 1, baz: 2}, {bar: 1, qux: 2}][state]
const getNewlyLoadedUsers = (state) => [{baz: 1, qux: 2}, {corge: 1, grault: 2}, {foo: 1, corge: 2}, {baz: 1, qux: 2}, {foo: 1, qux: 2}, {bar: 1, corge: 2}][state]
const hasFetchedForFilterQueryString = state => {
const filterQueryString = getFilterQueryString(state);
return either(
pipe(getPages, has(filterQueryString)),
pipe(getNewlyLoadedUsers, has(filterQueryString)),
)(state);
};
console .log ([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5].map(hasFetchedForFilterQueryString))
const hfffqs1 = either (
state => has(getFilterQueryString(state), getPages(state)),
state => has(getFilterQueryString(state), getNewlyLoadedUsers(state))
)
console .log ([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5].map(hfffqs1))
const hfffqs2 = either (
lift (has) (getFilterQueryString, getPages),
lift (has) (getFilterQueryString, getNewlyLoadedUsers)
)
console .log ([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5].map(hfffqs2))
const hfffqs3 = state => {
const query = getFilterQueryString(state);
return query in getPages(state)
|| query in getNewlyLoadedUsers(state)
}
console .log ([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5].map(hfffqs3))
.as-console-wrapper {min-height: 100% !important; top: 0}
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.js"></script>
<script> const {either, pipe, has, lift} = R </script>
添加回答
舉報(bào)