我的Spring應(yīng)用程序中有一些奇怪的行為，這是Java Spring Boot應(yīng)用程序的結(jié)構(gòu)：在包裝中com.somethingsomething.packageA，我有2個文件首先是ParentA.javapackage com.somethingsomething.packageA;import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;@Componentpublic class ParentA {    @Autowired    private ChildA childA;    public ChildA getChildA() {        return childA;    }    @PostConstruct    public void ParentAPostConstruct() {        System.out.println("ParentA PostConstruct were called");    }}第二個是ChildA.javapackage com.somethingsomething.packageA;import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;@Componentpublic class ChildA {    public ChildA() {        System.out.println("ChildA were called");    }}然后在package下com.somethingsomething.packageB，我也有兩個類似的文件。首先是ParentB.javapackage com.somethingsomething.packageB;import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;@Componentpublic class ParentB {    @Autowired    private ChildB childB;    public ChildB getChildB() {        return childB;    }    @PostConstruct    public void ParentBPostConstruct() {        System.out.println("ParentB PostConstruct were called");    }}第二個是ChildB.javapackage com.somethingsomething.packageB;import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;@Componentpublic class ChildB {    public ChildB() {        System.out.println("ChildB were called");    }}但是在這種情況下ChildA were called并ParentA PostConstruct were called沒有被假設(shè)要記錄。那么，為什么會發(fā)生這種特殊的行為呢？這是Spring的默認(rèn)行為嗎？